Flyboy in the Buttermilk: Essays on Contemporary America by Greg Tate
Big props to Farrar, Straus, and Giroux and NetGalley for allowing
me to preview an advanced copy of Greg Tate’s powerful collection of essays from
the 80s and 90s Flyboy in the Buttermilk: Essays on Contemporary America.
I’ve heard of Greg Tate, but I can’t believe I’ve never read anything by him up
until now. Reading the three introductions by Questlove, Henry Louis Gates Jr,
and Hanif Abdurraqib provided some great context for understanding not only Greg
Tate’s interests and subjects for his writing, but also his vast influence on
music, popular culture, and writing in general. While the introductions are
awesome, they don’t entirely capture the breadth of Tate’s interests captured
by the essays in this book. Whether it’s funk, pop music, hip hop, reggae, art,
literature, sci-fi, or movies, Tate’s writing clearly and enthusiastically shows
his passion for these arts and more importantly, his emphasis on promoting
artists uplifts many Black voices that were often silenced or relegated to the
underground at the expense of more mainstream pop acts and artists. Tate’s
collection is the kind of book that requires some notetaking to follow up on
the many different references, albums, songs, and titles he champions, and I’m
so appreciative for it.
One of my favorite elements of this book is Tate’s unique
voice in his writing. I absolutely loved his writing, especially about music.
The only music writers/critics I could liken him to are Lester Bangs and Greil
Marcus, who are both passionate and emphatic champions and critics of music
they like and dislike; however, Tate also has his own unique register, adding
elements of funk and hip-hop to his writing that emphasize his own distinct
voice in criticism. I noticed that this approach changes somewhat when he
writes about literature and politics in the latter sections of the book.
However, the first section that focuses primarily on his writings about music
is so much fun to read; I can only imagine Tate reading these essays out loud.
Furthermore, I was amazed to read phrases and lingo Tate uses in his early 80s
essays that are still in use today. I think this speaks to not only Tate’s
influence, but also his close ear and understanding of culture.
Although this book was originally published in 1992, it’s
still completely relevant today. In fact, I was surprised to see how much Tate’s
writing about African American literature and history was relevant to my undergraduate
studies, which again made me wonder why Tate wasn’t included in any of the anthologies
or required reading lists from my professors. Whether it’s discussing the battles
between Black leadership in the early 1900s in the quest for either
assimilation or equality or the burdens of Black writers and artists to
represent culture or to capitalize on the larger market for white audiences,
Tate’s writing remains relevant and trenchant, focusing on important
considerations for Black culture, artists, writers, and America in general. I
double checked my Norton Anthology of African American Literature edited
by Gates Jr. just to see if Tate was included in my 1997 edition, but he was
not. I hope that Gates Jr. has eventually included Tate in either subsequent
editions or other anthologies since I feel like Tate’s approach to many of the canonical
texts and arguments from African American literature and history is such a
unique, relevant, and engaging voice that challenges readers to question and
rethink their understandings of these texts, figures, and events.
The book is divided into three sections. Part One focuses on
music criticism, Part Two focuses mostly on literary and art criticism, and
Part Three focuses on current events and politics, mostly from the late 1980s
and early 1990s in New York. My favorite section was the music criticism
section, which was also the longest section in the book. This section is where
we see not just the breadth of Tate’s interests (Funk, Jazz, Blues, Rock, Hip-Hop,
House), but also the depths of these interests that Tate is willing to pursue
to further untangle and share with his audience. I loved how much he writes
about Miles Davis, especially reevaluating the electric and later stages of
Miles’ career, looking at Miles’ role as not just a Black artist, but an
American force of culture who reshaped art and popular music by pursuing his
own passions and interests. Tate also explores areas in Jazz that fragmented in
the 1960s and 70s, examining the kind of schisms that created paths for
standard bearers like the Marsalis family and the paths that diverged to other
space ways and areas carved out by avant-garde and free jazz artists. It’s an
issue about Black art that re-appears throughout Tate’s book in different forms
including fine art vs. graffiti, R & B vs. Pop Music (Prince and Michael
Jackson), and literature (Amiri Baraka). Tate seems to update DuBois’s notion
of the veil but situates it in the context of American popular culture and the
cultural marketplace of the latter 20th century, where an artist’s
existence is sometimes dependent on an audience. One of Tate’s targets is
Michael Jackson, whose most popular albums Thriller and Bad, Tate
criticizes for their emptiness and pursuit of mass audiences at the expense of
the kind of soulfulness or artistic integrity that are apparent in other Black contemporary
artists of Michael’s time. My favorite pieces, though, were focused on Public
Enemy, whose music from the late 80s and 90s is such an integral part of my life.
Tate’s writing about Public Enemy is so accurate and fun, and he captures the energy
and power of the band’s sound and vision and how it helped to shape and redirect
the hip-hop scene into something more conceptual rather than commercial.
Although Section Three deals with events from NYC in the
late 80s and early 90s, I was surprised to see how relevant Tate’s analyses and
criticisms are for today. Furthermore, since I was younger and not living in the
NYC area at the time, I wasn’t as familiar with the murders of Michael Griffith
in Howard Beach or Yusef Hawkins in Bensonhurst, except from the references from
PE. Tate critically examines these incidents and contextualizes them along with
the Central Park Five injustice to criticize the press, the police, and
leadership at all levels for allowing racial violence and intolerance to
continue to fester in the city. Even though Tate’s book was originally
published nearly 35 years ago, his critiques and observations are still
relevant and on point. While I have many annotations throughout the book, the
last essay “Love and the Enemy” has a particular quote at its end that
surprised me with its relevance and prescience. The essay is powerful in its
message of love for and in the African American community, in which Tate calls
out white supremacy for fomenting hate among African Americans. He cites both
Malcolm X and Bob Marley as calling for love for self rather than the love and
desire for the oppressor. For Tate, these power structures enable people to
ignore systemic inequalities because they are more concerned individual status.
“When reactive rage is the dominant form of our politics, when it takes police
or mob violence to galvanize us into reaction, it means that there is an
acceptable level of suffering and misery.” I’m not saying this is still true,
but I think it’s a powerful quote that should move all people to recognize that
the fight and struggle continues today as politics and culture remain reactive
rather than accepting or accommodating. This is an incredible and important
collection of essays, and I’m so glad that it is being republished. I can only
hope that Greg Tate’s voice reaches more eyes and ears as a result of this new
edition, and people can learn to appreciate the critical eye and humor in his
work. Even though the essays are between 35-45 years old, they are still
relevant, prescient, observant, critical, and engaging. Highly recommended!


















